Files
William RickertandClaude Opus 5 519c3a22e4 Fix paths after the docs/Documents merge
Every image and link pointed at docs/, which no longer exists - the README
rendered with six broken images. Repoints them at Documents/, updates the
board table to the real Schematics/Left|Right|Numpad tree, and renames
firmware/ to Firmware/ to match the capitalised convention.

Documents/README.md now describes the whole folder rather than just the
datasheets, since the diagrams and BOM live there too.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 08:26:38 -05:00

46 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown

# Licensing
This project is under **two** licences, because it has to be.
| Path | Licence |
|---|---|
| `Schematics/`, `Documents/`, `README.md` | **CC BY-NC-SA 4.0** — [`LICENSES/CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0.txt`](LICENSES/CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0.txt) |
| `Firmware/` | **GPL-2.0-or-later** — [`LICENSES/GPL-2.0.txt`](LICENSES/GPL-2.0.txt) |
| `Documents/*.PDF` | Third-party vendor datasheets. Not mine to license. |
## The hardware: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Build one, change it, share what you change — but don't sell it.
- **BY** — credit the original.
- **NC** — no commercial use.
- **SA** — derivatives must carry this same licence.
### Two things to be clear about
**This is not "open source" or "open hardware" by the formal definitions.** Both
the OSI and OSHWA definitions require permitting commercial use, so a
NonCommercial term disqualifies it. That is a deliberate choice here, not an
oversight — but it means OSHWA will not certify it, some people will decline to
contribute on principle, and it cannot be called open source without being
wrong.
**"NonCommercial" is genuinely fuzzy.** Creative Commons defines it as use "not
primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or monetary
compensation." That leaves real ambiguity: a fab house charging to make you a
board is fine, a company using it internally is arguable, someone selling
assembled units is not. Enforcement is on the copyright holder.
## The firmware: GPL-2.0, and it cannot be otherwise
Anything derived from QMK is GPL-2.0, and **the GPL explicitly permits
commercial use**. A NonCommercial restriction cannot be added to GPL-derived
code — doing so would violate the GPL and make the result undistributable.
So the firmware in this repo is GPL-2.0-or-later. Someone may legally sell
firmware derived from it. That is not a gap in the licensing; it is the price of
building on QMK, and there is no version of this project where it isn't true.
The hardware restriction still stands on its own: the thing you would need to
*build and sell* is the board, and that is NC.